|
COVER Story
Volume 2, Number 1
January 2004
A national voice for research postdocs
Postdoctoral research scientists who are concerned that they have slipped through
the cracks of the defined scientific work force have banded together to form the
National Postdoctoral Association
(NPA), a cross-disciplinary group working with universities and federal and private
funding agencies to improve postdocs' lives.
The group maintains that postdocs, for the most part, do not and ought
to have well-defined expectations of employment, appropriate employment
rights and responsibilities, and commensurate or even normalized pay scales. It
also calls for postdocs to have performance evaluations, consistent employment
benefits such as proper health care, pensions and occupational health insurance
and procedures for resolving conflict.
Created by the leadership of various postdoc associations at American universities,
the association is funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and housed at the
American Association for the Advancement of Science. While open to all scholars,
its active members are mostly from life sciences disciplines, which make up three-quarters
of postdoctoral fellowships in the United States. However, one of this year's
goals is to attract social scientists to the membership, says NPA Executive Director
Alyson Reed.
"Postdocs often have an ambiguous status within institutions it
isn't clear if they are considered students or faculty or staff which makes
it hard for them to find resources or access services that faculty and students
use," says Reed. "We aim to remedy this essential problem."
NPA insists that institutions clear up that ambiguity and resolve other practical,
quality-of-life issues for postdocs, she adds.
This past October, in response to a National Science Board (NSB) report on
work force policies in science and engineering (available at www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/2003/nsb0369/),
the association made recommendations on how the science community could improve
conditions for postdocs:
Reduce time spent in training positions from as much as four or five years, to
a standard of no more than two years.
Increase opportunities
for transition to independence as an unsupervised scientist.
Help secure appropriate
status, compensation and benefits for all postdocs, such as prompt title changes
and standardized pay scales and health benefits.
Create opportunities
for interdisciplinary training.
The association is also advising the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Advisory
Committee to the Director and has submitted a white paper of its recommendations
to the committee, Reed says. The committee could make significant changes in the
treatment of postdoctoral scholars required for federal funding.
"Our real success in the last year has been getting these issues on that
national community's table," Reed says. "Funding institutions, the NSB,
the NIH, academic institutions, preceptors and principal investigators, and the
postdocs themselves all bear responsibility for quality of life and opening
up the dialog is the first step in learning how to cooperate."
Ideally, says Reed, she'd like to see every institution that hosts postdocs
establish an office of postdoc affairs that monitors employment conditions and
assists fellows who feel they've been discriminated against in receiving credit
for work or intellectual property.
NPA is also keeping an eye on the challenges faced by international postdocs,
who face new worries about U.S. residency due to a clamp-down on student visas.
The association will try to increase its visibility, membership and local affiliations
in the next year, says Reed, who indicates that all signs point to a productive
future for NPA.
"We've been welcomed into every corridor we've entered in the last year,"
she says. "There's real interest in the scientific community to address the
concerns of its postdocs."
K. KERSTING

For more information on the National Postdoctoral Association,
including a listing of committees actively recruiting new members, visit www.nationalpostdoc.org.
top
|