APA Accreditation Process
How does a program become accredited?
APA accreditation is voluntary, meaning that programs choose whether and when to apply for it. The process begins when a program submits a self-study via the online Commission on Accreditation (CoA) Portal. The self-study includes information related to:
- Institutional and program context
- Aims, competencies and outcome data
- Student/trainee, faculty and financial resources
- Program policies and procedures
The self-study will undergo an initial review, with the following possible:
- Approval of a site visit, meaning that the self-study materials are in place for a site visit team of professional colleagues to conduct an on-site review of the program.
- Denial of a site visit, meaning that the self-study does not demonstrate sufficient consistency with the Standards of Accreditation in Health Service Psychology (SoA) in order for a site visit to be of value to the program.
After the site visit, the site visit team submits a report to the CoA, and the program has an opportunity to review and comment on that report. After this process is complete, the program is placed on the CoA's next program review agenda. The CoA awards accreditation to those programs judged to be in accordance with the SoA. The CoA can also deny accreditation to applicant programs if the program does not meet the SoA.
The Accreditation Operating Procedures (PDF, 817KB) fully articulates the accreditation process.
The timeline varies depending on a variety of factors. The CoA cannot guarantee a specific timeframe for the site visit or final decision. Please contact the Office of Program Consultation and Accreditation for additional information on expected timelines and variables.
An accredited program cannot have its accreditation revoked without first being placed on “accredited, on probation” status. Revocation of accreditation occurs when the CoA, in its review of a program on “accredited, on probation” status, has evidence that the program continues to be inconsistent with the SoA.
The effective date of the revocation is the date of the CoA meeting in which the decision was made. If the program appeals the CoA's decision to revoke, and that decision is upheld, the revocation will take effect 30 days after the appeal hearing is held. Individuals completing the program after that date are not considered to have completed an accredited program.
The Commission on Accreditation (CoA) may defer a program on its agenda prior to making a decision. Deferral actions are confidential. The CoA may defer programs for the following reasons:
Deferral for information
The CoA may defer making a decision about a program in order to obtain more information. Further, when in the CoA's judgment, information is incomplete or a significant disparity exists between the site visit report and information provided in the program's response to that report, the CoA may defer making a decision and seek additional information to resolve the difference. When a decision is deferred, the CoA will notify the program in writing and specify what additional information is needed to determine the program's consistency with the SoA.
Deferral for cause
When the CoA has concerns which may result in a decision to deny a site visit upon application, deny accreditation, place an accredited program on probation or revoke accreditation, it will defer its final decision, give written notice to the program of its concerns and thereby provide opportunity to supplement the information provided by the program, before the final decision is made.
When the CoA has deferred a program, either for information or for cause, the program continues to hold its current accreditation status until a final decision has been reached. Deferral actions by the CoA are confidential and will not be shared with the public.
The Commission on Accreditation conducts all of its final accreditation reviews and decision making sessions in a closed meeting. In the end, only the accreditation decision is released to the public. Accreditation is meant to be a process of peer review and a forum for honest, ongoing self-evaluation. Accrediting bodies must strike a balance between the public's right to information and the programs' need for honest self-evaluation. The purpose of this confidentiality throughout the accreditation process is for the programs' protection.
Effective July 1, 2005, the Accreditation Operating Procedures changed to allow the office to provide the public with a list of programs that have applied for initial accreditation. If prospective students call to confirm a program’s application and progress in seeking accreditation, the staff can only confirm whether or not a program has submitted its initial application. Staff members do not have the ability to tell prospective students if or when a program might become accredited. In addition, staff will neither be able to confirm nor deny whether a program ever applied for initial accreditation prior to July 1, 2005.